BirdyChat becomes first European chat app that is interoperable with WhatsApp - A Developer's Story

Enjoy this article? Clap on Medium to help it reach more people, or buy me a coffee

The First Domino Falls: BirdyChat's WhatsApp Interoperability Signals a Seismic Shift in Messaging

The Hook

For the first time in messaging history, users can now send messages from a third-party European app directly to WhatsApp users without anyone needing to switch platforms.

BirdyChat, a relatively unknown messaging app from Europe, just achieved what Silicon Valley giants have been either unable or unwilling to do for years: crack open the walled garden of WhatsApp's 2.7 billion users.

This isn't just another messaging app launch—it's the first concrete evidence that the European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA) is fundamentally reshaping how Big Tech operates.

The question isn't whether this changes everything; it's how fast the dominoes will fall.

Background: The Fortress of Modern Messaging

To understand why BirdyChat's achievement matters, we need to examine the fortress that modern messaging has become.

Since the smartphone era began, messaging platforms have operated as isolated kingdoms. WhatsApp users could only message other WhatsApp users. iMessage remained locked to Apple devices.

Telegram, Signal, and dozens of other platforms each created their own isolated ecosystems.

This fragmentation wasn't accidental—it was strategic. Network effects, where a platform becomes more valuable as more people use it, created natural monopolies.

WhatsApp's acquisition by Meta (then Facebook) for $19 billion in 2014 wasn't about the technology; it was about owning the network.

Once users and their entire social graphs were locked in, switching costs became prohibitive. Want to use a more privacy-focused alternative?

Good luck convincing your entire family group chat to move with you.

The technical barriers to interoperability were always surmountable. Email has been interoperable since its inception—Gmail users can email Outlook users without thinking twice.

The XMPP protocol once promised the same for instant messaging before corporate giants abandoned it.

The real barriers were business ones: why would WhatsApp, with its massive user base, allow competitors to benefit from its network effect?

Enter the Digital Markets Act. The EU's landmark legislation, which came into full force in March 2024, designated certain platforms as "gatekeepers" and mandated that they must allow interoperability.

WhatsApp, as part of Meta's empire, had no choice but to comply.

The company announced its interoperability plans earlier this year, but most industry observers expected a slow, reluctant rollout with minimal functionality.

Project illustration

Project visualization

BirdyChat just proved them wrong.

Key Details: How BirdyChat Cracked the Code

BirdyChat's implementation represents a masterclass in technical execution meeting regulatory opportunity.

The app, developed by a small team based in Amsterdam, has fewer than 100,000 users—a rounding error compared to WhatsApp's billions.

Yet they've managed to be first to market with a feature that fundamentally challenges the messaging status quo.

Project illustration

Project visualization

The technical implementation relies on WhatsApp's newly exposed APIs, which Meta was required to develop under the DMA.

These APIs use the Signal Protocol for end-to-end encryption, ensuring that messages remain secure even when traveling between different platforms.

BirdyChat's developers had to navigate several technical challenges:

Project illustration

Project visualization

First, they needed to implement compatible encryption that maintains WhatsApp's security standards.

This wasn't trivial—the Signal Protocol is open source, but implementing it correctly while maintaining interoperability required careful attention to cryptographic details.

Any mistakes could compromise user security or cause messages to fail delivery.

Second, they had to handle identity verification across platforms. When a BirdyChat user messages someone on WhatsApp, both systems need to verify that the users are who they claim to be.

BirdyChat solved this through a careful authentication dance that respects both platforms' user verification systems while maintaining privacy.

Third, there's the challenge of feature parity. WhatsApp supports read receipts, typing indicators, media sharing, and group chats.

BirdyChat's initial implementation supports text messages and basic media sharing, with promises of additional features coming soon.

The company has been transparent about current limitations—group chats and voice calls aren't yet supported through the interoperability layer.

What's particularly clever about BirdyChat's approach is their user experience design. Users don't need to know or care about the technical complexity.

They simply add a WhatsApp contact using a phone number, and BirdyChat handles the routing automatically.

Messages appear in a unified interface that clearly marks which platform the recipient is using, but otherwise feels native to the BirdyChat experience.

The regulatory framework provided the opening, but BirdyChat's execution shows that smaller players can move faster than incumbents when opportunity arises.

While larger messaging platforms were likely waiting to see how the regulatory landscape would settle, BirdyChat's developers were already building.

Implications: The Beginning of the End for Messaging Monopolies

BirdyChat's breakthrough carries implications that extend far beyond a single app or even the messaging industry.

For developers, this represents a fundamental shift in how we think about building communication platforms.

The immediate impact is competitive dynamics. Every messaging app startup can now potentially access WhatsApp's massive user base. This dramatically lowers the barrier to entry for new players.

Previously, a new messaging app faced the chicken-and-egg problem: users wouldn't join without their contacts, and contacts wouldn't join without users. Interoperability breaks this cycle.

A privacy-focused app, a business-specific platform, or a gaming-centric messenger can now launch with the promise that users can still reach their WhatsApp contacts.

For security professionals, interoperability introduces new attack surfaces.

While the Signal Protocol provides robust encryption, the interfaces between platforms become potential vulnerability points. How do you handle metadata when messages cross platform boundaries?

What happens when one platform has a security breach—does it compromise messages on interconnected platforms?

These aren't theoretical concerns; they're practical challenges that security teams will need to address.

The business model implications are equally profound. WhatsApp's monetization strategy relies partly on business messaging and payments, services that benefit from platform lock-in.

If users can access WhatsApp's network from competing apps that offer better business tools or lower fees, Meta's revenue model faces pressure.

We might see a shift toward platforms competing on features and user experience rather than network size alone.

There's also the question of innovation velocity. Closed platforms could previously innovate without worrying about compatibility. Now, new features need to consider interoperability from the start.

Will this slow innovation as platforms need to coordinate, or will it accelerate competition as platforms differentiate on user experience rather than network lock-in?

For enterprise developers, this opens new possibilities. Companies could build internal messaging systems that seamlessly connect with consumer platforms.

Imagine a corporate communication tool that lets employees message WhatsApp users directly for customer service while maintaining compliance and security controls.

The boundary between enterprise and consumer messaging could blur significantly.

What's Next: The Domino Effect

BirdyChat's success is likely just the opening move in a larger transformation. Other European messaging apps are undoubtedly racing to implement similar functionality.

Signal, with its privacy-first approach, could gain significant traction if it allows users to maintain their privacy while still reaching WhatsApp contacts.

Telegram, with its massive user base in Europe, might finally bridge the gap to WhatsApp users who've been reluctant to switch.

The geographic expansion of these requirements will be crucial to watch. While the DMA applies only to the EU, similar legislation is being considered in other jurisdictions.

The UK's Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill includes interoperability provisions.

If the United States follows suit—a big if given the current regulatory climate—the global messaging landscape could transform completely.

Meta's response will be telling.

The company could embrace interoperability, potentially turning WhatsApp into the default backbone for global messaging while monetizing through services and business features.

Or it might do the minimum required for compliance while creating friction that discourages actual interoperability use.

Early indications suggest Meta is taking a cautious middle path, but competitive pressure from apps like BirdyChat might force a more decisive strategy.

The technical standards that emerge from this period will shape messaging for the next decade. Will the Signal Protocol become the universal standard?

Will new protocols emerge that better handle interoperability requirements?

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is already working on Messaging Layer Security (MLS), a protocol designed from the ground up for federated messaging.

BirdyChat's implementation might be using today's tools, but tomorrow's messaging infrastructure is being built now.

As we watch this unfold, the parallels to email are instructive but not perfect.

Email achieved interoperability but also inherited spam, security challenges, and a lowest-common-denominator feature set.

The messaging ecosystem has the opportunity to learn from those mistakes, building interoperability that maintains security, enables innovation, and respects user privacy.

BirdyChat has shown it's possible.

The question now is whether the industry will rise to the challenge or fragment into compliance-minimum implementations that technically meet requirements but fail to deliver on the promise of true interoperability.

The first domino has fallen. BirdyChat may be small today, but they've proven that the walls between messaging kingdoms can come down.

For developers, entrepreneurs, and users alike, the age of messaging monopolies might finally be ending. What comes next could be chaos, opportunity, or most likely, a fascinating mix of both.

---

Hey friends, thanks heaps for reading this one! 🙏

If it resonated, sparked an idea, or just made you nod along — I'd be genuinely stoked if you'd pop over to my Medium profile and give it a clap there. Claps help these pieces reach more people (and keep this little writing habit going).

Pythonpom on Medium ← follow, clap, or just browse more!

Zero pressure, but if you're in a generous mood and fancy buying me a virtual coffee to fuel the next late-night draft ☕, you can do that here: Buy Me a Coffee — your support (big or tiny) means the world.

Appreciate you taking the time. Let's keep chatting about tech, life hacks, and whatever comes next! ❤️